@GrumplessGrinch which is why finding that it’s a non-theorem is an unwanted complication.
@GrumplessGrinch What Cox was actually trying to show is that there’s nothing “like” probability theory that isn’t. I mostly agree…
-
-
-
@GrumplessGrinch On the other hand, brandishing it as proof of Bayes über alles when it isn’t even true seems really sketchy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.