"marital onanism" (withdrawal, I'm pretty sure) is acknowledged as being promoted by the new religions in 1900 http://books.google.com/books?id=shpYAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA198&lpg=PA198&dq=%22marital+onanism%22&source=bl&ots=7rhZSIOE04&sig=4fhTzYd1PuQAAkJSCfz-ZjbWxrM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cT07VMH4L4-syASs74LoBQ&ved=0CDUQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22marital%20onanism%22&f=false …
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
Another medical journal in 1899 find it much more worthy of approbation ;) http://books.google.com/books?id=s41XAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA325&lpg=PA325&dq=%22marital+onanism%22&source=bl&ots=unUJTw7uTL&sig=R6zR_aTtq0Q6EHlaqR7B3LLQQzY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cT07VMH4L4-syASs74LoBQ&ved=0CDAQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=%22marital%20onanism%22&f=false … "fervently lauded" haha I bet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing “Stockholm” is error for Stockham: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Bunker_Stockham … Fascinating character. The Oneida story is also very interesting.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing Since the NRMs of that time were definitely influenced by Hinduism, it would be interesting to know to what extent >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing > the Hindu methods of sexual tantra were the basis for karezza, and how much that fed into 1960s sexual practice…1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing My vague recollection is that _The Joy Of Sex_, breakthrough ‘60s manual, referenced karezza (but didn’t actually apply it)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I've read that! I do recall it depicting a number of nonreproductive sexual practices with enthusiasm though1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@sarahdoingthing Here we go! http://books.google.com/books?id=3KVA2_arcLsC&pg=PT340&lpg=PT340&dq=%22joy+of+sex%22+karezza&source=bl&ots=4jqUpsCNzJ&sig=tKBn3cDc-TUbP7Bc2PdHigOmvhk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Z2hEVNGgO5HViALzsICQBQ&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22joy%20of%20sex%22%20karezza&f=false … (damn I like living in the future)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.