Guys, what's that damn theorem about rational Bayesian agents w/access to same data agreeing? I am bad at names.
@St_Rev I haven’t taken the time to think through the exact implications of the construction—how pathlogical is this?—though.
-
-
@St_Rev “This is very simple. If the set of considered models does not contain the true model then Bayesian updating can go very wrong. > - 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.