@sarahdoingthing about ethics in general, but going back to original I doubt it’s what they had in mind. http://anglicansonline.org/basics/thirty-nine_articles.html …
@St_Rev Steelmanning, Jim point was that you should not condemn anyone for doing no more than ethically compulsory.
-
-
@St_Rev And, you should not congratulate yourself for supererogatory works, especially not in invidious comparison, i.e. SJWism. -
@St_Rev It’s pretty clear the text he cites doesn’t say anything like that, but I agree with the point. Otherwise, no ethical freedom.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.