@Meaningness Really? I've never had any flack for denouncing the two truths as a sop to ontology. Is it worse than that?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Sounds like you need an alter-ego...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava so self-appointed experts who want to argue by citing texts can’t get traction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava Tibetans love polemics based on what Tsongkhapa said re what Bhavaviveka said re what Dharmakirti said re what Chandrakiriti said1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava re what Nagarjuna said re what abhidharma said re something that made no sense even then. Pfui.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava Actually it goes a lot more levels than that but we’ve only got 140 chars here…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@Jayarava Which is the offensive part. One can say that but it won’t stick without explanation, which gets into the minefield.
10:43 AM - 27 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.