@GrumplessGrinch @drethelin The thing that made me pretty much switch off on LW was EY's insistence that MWI was obviously correct.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@drethelin Yeah. Most of my infinite-universe thinking is based on Tegmark IV.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin And Tegmark space is wildly, absurdly non-measurable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@drethelin Say more? I might have done something stupid to my epistemology.9 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin You can create miracle Ys of arbitrary complexity so how do you expect to do measure theory on the whole class?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@GrumplessGrinch isn't that where kolmogorov comes in?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@GrumplessGrinch Kolmogorov is utterly useless. I'll defer to@meaningness's exegesis there.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@drethelin@Meaningness Something specific to Kolmogorov or is it all formalizations of occam's razor?8 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch@drethelin But you should really just read@Meaningness's pieces on LW.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@drethelin@Meaningness I see two posts by David_Chapman on LW, neither (directly) on this topic.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@GrumplessGrinch @drethelin Yeah my outline for LW has 5 more posts, none on Kolmogoroff. But, as @St_Rev said, is in implication space.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.