@St_Rev also the "spend 20 minutes talking to the person and be honest with yourself" test, that works right
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev not a goal, not a binary, something like a glimmering semi-mirage of overlapping genuine indicators on a spectrum5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing But if you think of movement toward a local optimum, there's nowhere to go further. "Flourishing" & "progress" linearize.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Still reification. Is there any essence to flourishing *besides* lessness-of-concrete-harms?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing leaving aside essence: creativity & enjoyment, which do not seem to be “absence of harm”?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Hm. Good point, I concede the argument.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@Meaningness oh come on, what value has creativity except by improving mental states of the creative & maybe others? ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev@Meaningness key problem: part of flourishing *itself* is believing in the importance of something other than mental states :(2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev@Meaningness i.e. believing nothing matters but mental states is probably bad for mental states4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@sarahdoingthing @St_Rev yes, i think this is important. damn i miss my shift key
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.