@Meaningness Right, the scientistic model founded in measurement (chemical assays etc.) complicates & elaborates itself.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev with a vested interest in preserving the one-at-a-time model. And since anti-drug apparatus is not about drugs, no opposing interest1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness A bureacracy is a machine for generating bureaucracy. Automated sacralization, the liturgy inscribes itself.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness Previous tweet keeps phasing in and out of meaning for me. Usually means it's either good or stupid.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Every dynamic system that persists is an engine for creating itself, that's the evolutionary tautology, so that part's dumb.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev Foucault is very good on this; it’s his main point. Also Thorstein Veblen, whom no one except me has ever actually read.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev Veblen is like Darwin smart2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@sarahdoingthing @St_Rev Ahah! I’m not the only one who has read him after all! Yeah, he anticipates much of evopsych, for starters.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.