@St_Rev That makes sense! Best explanation so far. Requires that they are total idiots not to see alternative, but I guess that’s plausible.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness ...infrastructure. Something like that. They can't unlearn what they've learned to be.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev Hypothesis of that flavor: bureaucracy in charge of classifying drugs as illegal obstructs blanket illegality to preserve itself.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Right, the scientistic model founded in measurement (chemical assays etc.) complicates & elaborates itself.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev with a vested interest in preserving the one-at-a-time model. And since anti-drug apparatus is not about drugs, no opposing interest1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness A bureacracy is a machine for generating bureaucracy. Automated sacralization, the liturgy inscribes itself.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness Previous tweet keeps phasing in and out of meaning for me. Usually means it's either good or stupid.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness I think I was trying to get at something about...process as generator of its own legitimacy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness starting to remember again what burroughs must have felt when he decided to destroy language itself.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.