@VincentHorn > some of which may be a better fit for many contemporary secular people than those that did make it into the mix.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness : How is that not common garden variety style sectarianism?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VincentHorn
@VincentHorn Sectarianism is “Brand X is the best, and the others are wrong!” I try never to say that…Particularly, never to denigrate Sutra2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@VincentHorn In anything longer than a tweet, I point out the value of Sutra. What most people miss entirely is the *goal* of Sutra…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@VincentHorn … which is not the goal of *most* contemporary Americans. So it’s the wrong tool for the job *they* want done!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness : I disagree that the Sutric Buddhism you're describing and the insight & mindfulness movements are all that similar.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VincentHorn
@VincentHorn > for people who are world-affirming; and whether the empirical dangers of vipassana practice come from a mismatch there.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness : Does tantric practice not include any periods of dissolution and of having to let go of false identifications?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VincentHorn
@VincentHorn Sure! & everyone agrees that Vajrayana is dangerous—more dangerous than Sutra—which is stressed up-front.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness : I guess I don't understand then why you use the limitations/dangers of vipassana as an argument for why Tantra is good?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@VincentHorn I really hope I didn’t do that!! Don’t think I mentioned tantra/vajrayana at all yesterday?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.