@St_Rev @sarahdoingthing Oh, good, maybe I can disagree too! Please say more.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Invert the frame: pointing toward the infinite terminal object is distraction, *right here* is justification.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing I’m not good at this either—but it seems to work when I do it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Doesn't verbalize well, does it? Doesn't magically fix everything, either, but it helps a bit.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing (if we’re talking about the same “it,” which quite likely we aren’t…)4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Somewhat similar "its", I think. The focus on immanence in Zen is the Daoist part of it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing Yah. So, the Buddhist expression here is that suffering arises from comparison of reality with counterfactuals.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing The Daoist mode is imperative present tense: "look at this! Isn't that interesting! Wait, look at this now!"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing Yeah, also Buddhist tantra (and Zen to some extent, probably borrowing from both Daoism and tantra).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev so running by a dead cat I say to myself "I am also of this nature, subject to aging, death, and decay" but...poor cat8 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@sarahdoingthing @St_Rev > non-conceptually recognizing the non-separation of your sadness and the cat.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.