what consciousness is for http://users.wfu.edu/masicaej/BaumeisterMasicampo2010PsychRev.pdf … / consciousness v. dogs, trees, hurricanes http://www.theassc.org/files/assc/2653.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Can you sketch what’s interesting about the Polger paper in 140 chars?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness "Challenge: explain why high-level entities (dogs, trees) are compatible with physicalism but consciousness is not"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Tx! FWIW, I think framework (current analytic philosophy of mind/body problem) is so wrong that nothing good can come of it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing "Are hammers compatible with physicalism?" is an interesting question, though, and I think the answer is "somewhat not"2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@sarahdoingthing Cuz Heidegger, in part. Spozally will write about that in follow-up to http://meaningness.com/boundaries-objects-connections …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.