@St_Rev Maybe of interest: http://ow.ly/vlnRF A contemporary Taoist arguing vs moralism. Via @willbuckingham Also http://ow.ly/vloe9
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@willbuckingham 'My trailblazing thesis leads us to vanilla 2014 progressive values' is anticlimactic.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@Meaningness The book also sort of fizzles a bit as well...6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willbuckingham
@willbuckingham@Meaningness Huemer's paper http://studiahumana.com/pliki/wydania/In%20Praise%20of%20Passivity.pdf … is similar but more convincing/more flattering to my preconceptions.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@willbuckingham I like a lot about that paper... I think its central insight is somewhat different; wide politics vs local ethics.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@willbuckingham Also isn't explicitly Daoist but it's still v. Daoist. "Don't fight for what you believe in" overlaps w/Moeller3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@St_Rev @willbuckingham Huemer’s point is largely epistemological: we can’t know what policies are best. Möller’s point so far is ont-ish…
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.