(This line of thought influenced by @sarahdoingthing , @xuenay , & @willbuckingham — though they may not agree with my conclusions. Thanks!)
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing@willbuckingham Somewhat disagree on "most of life shouldn't involve ethical considerations".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xuenay
@xuenay@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Not sure. I think most of life *doesn't* involve ethical considerations (see Möller's The Moral Fool).4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willbuckingham
@willbuckingham@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing If so, either every decision involves moral considerations or none do, depending on framing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xuenay
@xuenay@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Does the way one frames it have to sit that squarely? Unconvinced.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willbuckingham
@willbuckingham@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Does framing it less squarely accomplish a purpose that the squareish framing does not?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xuenay
@xuenay@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing But possible to frame "morality" so that it can be present in some decisions, absent in others...?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willbuckingham
@willbuckingham@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing This tweet is too narrow to contain my clarified thoughts on this, so: http://pastebin.com/e5YA5aCa2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@xuenay @willbuckingham @sarahdoingthing I have some quibbles about the internal/external distinction here—but not in 140 characters :-(
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.