Scientists making philosophical pronouncements in areas they are unqualified gives aid & comfort to woomeisters. (How can this be avoided?)
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness To avoid this, we'd have to find people qualified to make philosophical pronouncements. I don't think there are any.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev The value of philosophy is that, I think—lots of “yeah but that doesn’t work, because…” knowledge.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness true. "This doesn't work" knowledge is waay easier than "this does work" knowledge.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev If I had to teach philosophy, it would be “Why 2500 years of Western thought is all wrong (and we have no better ideas).”5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I recently commented elsewhere that if I had a time machine and two bullets, I'd put one in Kant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@St_Rev “small emergency backup dog” http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1993-12-12/features/1993346224_1_dogs-hidden-life-bark …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness most important philosopher of 20c IMO0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.