@JeffryGonzalez Not sure what you mean. “Gods literally exist” is what Reggie Ray seems to be saying.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness but also all phenomena of duality. Your toaster, for example.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeffryGonzalez
@JeffryGonzalez So gods and toasters are both existent and non-existent, but are they existent and non-existent in exactly the same way?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness as aspects of innate mind, they are the same, yes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeffryGonzalez
@JeffryGonzalez Yeah, but the issue is not whether they exist as aspects of mind—no one has a problem with that—but externally.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness As usual, my problem is when we predicate "reality" on conventional mind. A proto-positivist dharma? No thanks!3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeffryGonzalez
@JeffryGonzalez Well, no one is going to force it on you!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Ha! That's good! I really like a lot of what you've written; very helpful! I hope I don't come of as adversarial at all.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeffryGonzalez
@JeffryGonzalez Naturalism is a very small part of what I want to write about. It’s important to some people (much more than it is to me).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I feel the future of Dharma is more from poetry and art than from physics and neuroscience.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JeffryGonzalez That I agree with strongly!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.