Arguing with myself about how hard a line to take on naturalism. Here’s a 2005 take from @willbuckingham : http://www.thinkbuddha.org/article/20/hurrah-for-materialismpart-ii …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness maybe the controversy is intentionally introduced so we can disabuse ourselves from the category error of imputing "existence"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeffryGonzalez
@JeffryGonzalez But it seems that it is those who insist gods exist who need to explain what they mean by “exist,” if there’s doubt.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness anybody that would take such a literalist approach to reality is sort of missing the point of the dharma, I'd say.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @JeffryGonzalez
@JeffryGonzalez “Gods ‘exist’ in some sense” (metaphorical? psychological? mythical? fictional?) is unproblematic for me…
3:17 PM - 16 Jan 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.