Arguing with myself about how hard a line to take on naturalism. Here’s a 2005 take from @willbuckingham : http://www.thinkbuddha.org/article/20/hurrah-for-materialismpart-ii …
@JeffryGonzalez Not sure what you mean. “Gods literally exist” is what Reggie Ray seems to be saying.
-
-
@Meaningness but also all phenomena of duality. Your toaster, for example. -
@JeffryGonzalez So gods and toasters are both existent and non-existent, but are they existent and non-existent in exactly the same way? - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness he says "all such nonhuman beings are ultimately seen as aspects of one’s own [innate] mind and not separate from it" -
@JeffryGonzalez But he then says that this misses the point; “such beings certainly do exist and are important co-inhabitants of our cosmos”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.