@Meaningness So what exactly is so bad about it? In general, acknowledging 'multiple lines of development' seems useful.
-
-
-
@mriramos I’m offended that he claims there has been no progress in Buddhism for a thousand years, ignoring vast actual progress. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ken Wilber’s grandiose “new” Buddhism is entirely old hat. Nothing in it that wasn’t already complete in the 1890s: http://meaningness.wordpress.com/2011/07/02/zen-vs-the-u-s-navy/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness I agree. Pretty delusional stuff. But, could be a nice little earner for Wilber & his buddies... -
@Sciamanoinglese Yeah, have to say, looks like it’s about money and ego mostly. Easy to be cynical, but looks deserved in this case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@gdngate Mmm, good point. I wasn’t expecting anything at all (although apparently this was completely predictable, says@hokaisobol !)
End of conversation
-
-
-
@Awbery@Meaningness@mriramos Used to work at new age bookstore, not hard to tell which authors believe what they say & which r shoveling.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness Filler for space most Buddhist teachers avoid or aren't explicit enough about. Also filler for "integral spirituality" fiasco.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.