@meaningness non-existence of ultimate meaning and value. It only proves the already obvious truth that meaning and value exist only in the
-
-
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@meaningness minds that fabricate them. Unless one is willing to accept the proposition that there exists some supreme mind, or suppose that2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@meaningness meaning and value exist as properties independent of specific things or as intrinsic properties of those things(both of which1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@meaningness are absurd), nihilism stands as the only remaining, and I believe, correct position.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@nihilaeternum I agree that meaning is not objective/ultimate. But not non-existent or illusory, either.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Meaning is an entirely subjective affair. It exists only as a habit of the mind.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@Meaningness Proposition: "Meaning is illusory".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@Meaningness Proof: Assume that meaning is not illusory. That would imply that it exists independently of its existence in the minds of any1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@Meaningness comparably situated percipients. Due to the fact that meaning is a creation of minds alone, we see that this is impossible, nay1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voluntasadnihil
@Meaningness , absurd. Thus by reductio ad absurdum, we are compelled to conclude that meaning is illusory. Q.E.D.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@vitaoblivionis You assume that meaning is either in the mind or in the world. This dualism does not hold.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.