@Meaningness because without him there would be nothing to reform?
-
-
-
@vajramrita Yes… but they re-mythologize him to serve their own programs. Which is OK, but why not admit it? Cf. http://buddhism-for-vampires.com/necrophiliac-dakini …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness must be something in it....? -
@Meaningness shakyamuni existed...yes? - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness buying into myths is usually extremely adaptive: gives you focus and camaraderie with myth-buyers. -
@drethelin Yes; the puzzle is that Pepper and Batchelor reject most of the Buddhist myths, so I don’t know why they keep this one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness hard to find smart skeptical people who don't buy into some mythThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.