@St_Rev @simplic10 … it becomes Sisyphean. Or Augean. “No, those 200 integrals don’t solve the problem, HERE IS WHAT THEY ACTUALLY SAY…”
@St_Rev @themattsimpson …which is why I’m not confident I can get across this more complicated point. Basic reasoning eludes rationalists…
-
-
@Meaningness @themattsimpson Did you have a look at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1563882 … yet? The "Taxonomy of Uncertainty" in it seems relevant. -
@St_Rev @themattsimpson Have only glanced through it so far. Yes, seems highly relevant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness @themattsimpson ...and think they're done, and anything more is hopeless wooliness, cf. snide "Anton-Wilsonism" comments. -
@St_Rev @themattsimpson Yes, I think that’s exactly right. Cf. my exchanges with mtraven on my blog.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness @themattsimpson In some sense the problem is that they've moved one or two levels away from Aristotelian/Platonic certainty...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.