@themattsimpson @St_Rev @simplic10 … which is a huge job and too difficult for most readers to follow, or else give up.
@St_Rev @simplic10 … it becomes Sisyphean. Or Augean. “No, those 200 integrals don’t solve the problem, HERE IS WHAT THEY ACTUALLY SAY…”
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson
@Meaningness@simplic10 I would warn that while I've *taught* classes in statistics, I've never actually taken one. -
@St_Rev @themattsimpson …which is why I’m not confident I can get across this more complicated point. Basic reasoning eludes rationalists… - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 But if an LW priest comments on my post “you are ignorant, this is a solved problem, see Jaynes ch.18”…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 …would anyone take what I said seriously? And at that point, either I have to explain why J’s soln fails…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 This was my original question: can LW be shifted out of Bayesian religion by rational argument? I dunno.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 No, they are both 1/2.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 Yes, that’s right. It’s a nice bit of math, but epicyclic in that you have the same issue >Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 > of pulling numbers out of your ass at this meta level.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.