@themattsimpson @St_Rev @simplic10 But if an LW priest comments on my post “you are ignorant, this is a solved problem, see Jaynes ch.18”…
@St_Rev @simplic10 … it becomes Sisyphean. Or Augean. “No, those 200 integrals don’t solve the problem, HERE IS WHAT THEY ACTUALLY SAY…”
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 …would anyone take what I said seriously? And at that point, either I have to explain why J’s soln fails…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 … which is a huge job and too difficult for most readers to follow, or else give up. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 This was my original question: can LW be shifted out of Bayesian religion by rational argument? I dunno.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 No, they are both 1/2.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 Yes, that’s right. It’s a nice bit of math, but epicyclic in that you have the same issue >Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 > of pulling numbers out of your ass at this meta level.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 Only now you have to pull functions over [0,1] out of your ass instead of a single value.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson
@St_Rev@simplic10 Hmm. Maybe I should be flattered… but I’m not confident LW will buy it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.