If enlightenment is a *human* potential, surely there'd be as many men as women experiencing it? But it seems abundantly to be men.
-
-
Replying to @VincentHorn
@VincentHorn@Meaningness@twombh Is enlightenment different for non-humans? (Namkhai Norbu's book said Dzogchen was known on other planets)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mriramos
@mriramos@VincentHorn@twombh I suspect the word is used to mean many different things, and so is worse than useless.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@mriramos@twombh : Does meaning different things, if the meaning and context is clear, make it useless? I don't find that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VincentHorn
@VincentHorn@mriramos@twombh Is fine if clear in context! I often don’t find that with “enlightenment.”1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@mriramos@twombh : I always try and make the context clear. And when it's clear, i think generally people find it helpful.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VincentHorn
@VincentHorn@mriramos@twombh That’s interesting and believable...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness : At the end of the day though I still find any particular model of enlightenment can often conceal more than it reveals.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@VincentHorn Ah, yes, that’s also my concern (in addition to the polysemy).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.