Although tantra *could* be stripped of all supernatural elements, a *compulsion* to do so is a manifestation of the purity orientation…
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness what if instead of a compulsion it is a desire to see what still holds water when you remove outdated superstition?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @embodiedsacred
.
@embodiedsacred To be clear, my own view is (methodologically) naturalistic.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @embodiedsacred
@embodiedsacred Methodologically, we should dismiss spooks for lack of evidence. But I see no a priori reason they COULDN'T exist.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness same is true of unicorns and purple headed people eaters. argument from ignorance/burden of proof fallacies are tempting!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @embodiedsacred
@embodiedsacred The point about species of naturalism is purely technical, and has no significant implications.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness so it is a form of intellectual obfuscation? ;)4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@embodiedsacred No, just trying to be epistemologically precise. Again: in this case, absence of evidence is excellent evidence of absence.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.