@St_Rev @TheViewFromHell Rule 34. a/k/a de gustibus non est disputandum.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @TheViewFromHell Yeah, but most fetishes make *some* kind of sense.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @TheViewFromHell Can understand anything being fetish to somebody--Pareidolia &c. *Common* fetishes need more explanation tho.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @TheViewFromHell What distingushed the anteater from a pet?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev @TheViewFromHell Not sure. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprinting_%28psychology%29#Filial_imprinting … . Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprinting_%28psychology%29#Sexual_imprinting … : apparently my idea was old hat. So to speak.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @TheViewFromHell Like I said, I can understand anything being a fetish to *someone*, it's the common fetishes that puzzle me.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@Meaningness @TheViewFromHell So the question is why fetishes aren't randomly distrubted but rather seem kinda bell curvey?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GKBesterfriend
@KarmaKaiser@Meaningness @TheViewFromHell Yeah. E.g.: why are foot/shoe fetishes so common compared to hand/glove fetishes?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@St_Rev @KarmaKaiser @TheViewFromHell I would start to investigate that question by watching/reading shoe porn & talking w/ fetishists.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.