.@St_Rev Right, that’s the same critique I would make. For *any* statistical approach to apply, you have to *already* understand situation.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness So it might be worth explicitly going to the root, the base axioms, and saying 'but look, you can't *do* this. for example...'1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness ...epistemological mistakes have destroyed trillions of dollars of wealth. Something similar going on here that needs debunking2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness And that's a small group compared to the number who lost wealth because of them. Put another way: if not these guys, who?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Remember that Ayn Rand's cult spawned Alan Greenspan.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness ...path vs. what they will if steered away from mistakes XYZ. Evaluating that is of course impossible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Traditionally one hits the student with a ceremonial stick, but it's hard to do that over the internet.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.