@St_Rev Not sure I follow? What is the form of breakdown you mean here?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Which relates to Rumsfeld's 'unknown unknowns' and Taleb's 'ludic fallacy'.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness So it might be worth explicitly going to the root, the base axioms, and saying 'but look, you can't *do* this. for example...'1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Yes, that's what I mean. Real situations where the axiomatic approach leads you astray from the first step.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Yeah, I'm not the person to do it, I'm an algebraist. My interest in statistics is strictly amateur.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness That's why I'd suggest concrete examples. e.g. Taleb uses the Thanksgiving turkey to illustrate problems with induction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.