"Pop Bayesianism: cruder than I thought?" I puzzle over a peculiar, partly appealing spiritual movement. http://ow.ly/lLVdj
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness a formula can be informative via points about limiting cases, scaling behaviour, what variables it does and does not depend on3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee Yes... I don't see that discussed, but maybe missed it... for Bayes' Rule, I'm not sure what this would imply... expand?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness e.g., "for evidence to be very strong, it must be very unlikely under alternative hypotheses, not just very likely under yours"1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee That's good, yes! Cf the Slate DNA-match piece from yesterday (aargh).
9:27 AM - 6 Jun 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.