@Meaningness a formula can be informative via points about limiting cases, scaling behaviour, what variables it does and does not depend on
-
-
-
@tipsfromkatee Yes... I don't see that discussed, but maybe missed it... for Bayes' Rule, I'm not sure what this would imply... expand? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness@St_Rev if it's so obvious and commonsense why did people puzzle over the Raven Paradox for so long? -
@admittedlyhuman Missing some context—@St_Rev 's deleted tweet—but... I said Bayes' Rule is obvious *if* know probability principles.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness the suggested dichotomy according to which a formula is either explicitly applied or merely a religious symbol is a false one -
@tipsfromkatee I'm struggling to find a way to make a constructive critique.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson
@Meaningness@St_Rev it's easy to say "it's all just arithmetic" but "you have to do the arithmetic" is still an insight. -
@admittedlyhuman @themattsimpson The real insight comes from *when* to do arithmetic and when numbers are going to confuse you. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev@Meaningness the fundamental tenets of "pop bayesianism"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev @themattsimpson@Meaningness I'm quoting this dude's article ok, you will not understand if you do not skim itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.