@St_Rev [Brain: swap swap swap… quotient… quotient… oh here we are] Yeah, nice analogy. [Had to pull that off of mag tape.]
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness OK, on rereading 3.1 and thinking about it, I feel comfortable dismissing the entire paper vigorously now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness You can list every idea that can be expressed in a given language, but not in a helpful way, & list won't be finite.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness That's why I said 'can be expressed'. Could perhaps argue that expressible ideas are dense in the set of ideas, like Q in R.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness There's a straight analogy there to terminating vs. infinite decimal expansions, that's all I'm saying.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness And that precisely is why the argument about 'exist' is so much ghost-chasing. 'exist' doesn't exist.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.