If I persuaded the LessWrong cultists that Bayesianism is silly, would they do something useful instead? Or fetishize another hobbyhorse?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov The theorem is true and occasionally useful, of course. The metaphysics is neither. The hype is neither.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov@Meaningness Sure would be interesting to see this argument play out in some format that wasn't limited to 140 chars.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtraven
@mtraven@MikeAnissimov Check my subsequent tweets to@St_Rev for a sort of summary...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @mtraven Probably talking past each other, yes, and 140 doesn't help!
12:55 PM - 26 Apr 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.