@KarmaKaiser @GabrielDuquette Oh. Maybe you can explain why that is wrong?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@GabrielDuquette "Only good models get to have truth value" is not a model but a metaphysical claim. Therefore self refuting.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GKBesterfriend
@KarmaKaiser@GabrielDuquette “We cannot evaluate claims we have no way of evaluating” does not seem problematic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@GabrielDuquette But that is trivial and doesn't include metaphysical demonstration as a type of "evaluation"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GKBesterfriend
@KarmaKaiser@GabrielDuquette What is metaphysical demonstration?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@GabrielDuquette A demonstration that some concept or idea is a necessary pre req to understanding as such is a good first pass1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GKBesterfriend
@KarmaKaiser@GabrielDuquette I guess I’ve been unimpressed by those (if I understand the class you refer to).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@GabrielDuquette "It is possible for an AI to be concious" or "It is impossible for an AI to be concious" are both metaphysical1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GKBesterfriend
@KarmaKaiser@GabrielDuquette I have no idea how you’d evaluate those. All I can do is suspend the question.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@GabrielDuquette ...hence my implicating idealism or panpsychism or neutral monism. At the least it'd be "not physicalism"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@KarmaKaiser @GabrielDuquette I don’t feel a need to take any position on the mind/body problem. (Wrote about that at http://buddhism-for-vampires.com/metablog/philosophical-zombie …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.