@St_Rev @VermiciousKnid1 It didn’t even pretend to have a peer review system (according to wiki; I wouldn’t know).
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@VermiciousKnid1 It had strong editorial oversight. Downplaying that was part of the attempt at coverup.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@VermiciousKnid1 cf. the self-description & submission guidelines at http://socialtext.dukejournals.org/1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@VermiciousKnid1 Bleagh. Put me right off the project. You’d have to read a bunch of this crap to imitate it competently.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@VermiciousKnid1 ...couldn't distinguish between 'real' work and a meaningless bluff. That was the real accomplishment.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@VermiciousKnid1 I used to amuse myself at academic parties by seeing which fields I could pass myself off as a graduate student in.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@VermiciousKnid1 And actually I’m not sure how long I could bluff lit crit. Maybe he’s read more of it than I have...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@St_Rev @VermiciousKnid1 Yeah, that’s great! Read it a billion years ago. Specially loved “the Intel i486DX Programmer's Reference Manual”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.