@semiotechnic Yes, indeed, agreed. Still, a larger-scale experiment is tempting.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic If academia were serious about itself, this would be the #1 funding priority.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic Peer review is the most important filter in the world, and we have no idea what the false positive rate is.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic Although there’s a current attempt to replicate 100 randomly-chosen medical journal publications. Or something like that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic The reddit model? Or do you mean just blinding the process? Some journals do blind; I don’t know why they don’t all.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic Yes… although clearly there would be a different set of pathologies if it were open. Cf. front page of reddit.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic :-) Quite so!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic Maybe… any system is bound to be gamed, so maybe the best thing you can do is stamp on pathologies as they arise…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic But maybe the root problem is disciplines that are not accountable to any outside world, and so become pure status-signallingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@semiotechnic … which was Sokal’s point, I guess. I’m talking in circles!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.