Tom Pepper is unnecessarily obnoxious, but his unique interpretation of anatman is significant and constructive: http://ow.ly/gSLrb
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness and the relationship between the two is?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita Nothing. Are you asking why I mentioned his obnoxiousness?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness the juxtapostion does seem ... curious ...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita Acknowledging this may make it more likely that people will accept my recommendation of the work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness if their work was more descriptive than prescriptive, I would agree with you. But it isn't.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita So, which part do you disagree with? That it is worth reading Tom Pepper's new anatman paper? (Just curious.)
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness why won't I read the paper? For the same reason I don't read Nietzsche or Heidegger - their personal politics turns me off.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@vajramrita Ah, I see, thanks!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.