Which of these would you most want in paperback?
Contemplating. The whole thing will clearly never be finished, so the question is how to get the most usefulness in the time available.
-
-
I think with the new complete stance sections there is a version that exists that is complete. I do think all of the unfinished section stubs and pointing to how much more there is does the existing material a bit of a disservice
-
That stuff makes it harder to navigate, can make readers feel a sense of “I won’t read it now, I’ll wait til it’s done”, etc. I think re-approaching the project in its current state and orienting around the most important elements of what’s there would make it way more accessible
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
The "Meaningness overview" would cover the conceptual framework and explain briefly the most common stances:
* eternalism, nihilism, existentialism, and the complete stance
* no-self, true self, and nebulously patterned self
* mission, materialism, & enjoyable usefulness