I'm not even sure he means it, or perhaps just has a very idiosyncratic definition of philosophy, because he cites philosophers to supposedly useful ends all the time. One example, I quickly found:https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1203342162991046657?s=20 …
-
-
I would not claim your whole project is philosophy! Just that it used some philosophy, did make some philosophical claims at points. The scope, I have no idea since I have not read all of it. It would seem to me a lot of it discusses cultural and psychological states (1/2)
-
some of which have philosophical correlates. You would agree with this, I assume. Topics like “eternalism”, “post-modernism”, etc. in the context of this, you do engage in seemingly philosophical talk, scattered claims. Like ‘implicit metaphysical errors’. (2/2)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not your whole project, but you're still doing software engineering. You are also grossly understating the role of philosophy in your work by making that comparison.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Why Heidegger is so important for our current cultural crisis of meaning; & also for re-thinking obsolete concepts of what we are are do.
Inspiring introduction by