False dichotomy - it's not 'either phil is the only authoritative discourse' or 'phil is totally bunk and useless.' Philosophy makes significant contributions to meaningness, many of which you don't address in the book. The phil method would also help.
-
-
Yea I’d be super interested to see that section. I haven’t read the whole book yet but your approach seems very similar to several existentialist views
-
I suspect you are laboring under the misapprehension that meaning must be either objective or subjective. Obviously I am not endorsing an objective story, and existentialism is the salient subjective one, so you mistake my story for that.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Existentialism’s failure is very well understood, so it’s boring to write about, but I suppose necessary because lots of people still get caught in it 50 years after it died.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.