(I don’t know about CRs specifically but) this distinction between ontological nebulosity and epistemic uncertainty is the central thing rationalists (other brands at least) don’t understand (and often seem to actively resist understanding for emotional safety reasons)
-
-
It seems like some people seemingly intuitively understand it (e.g. LessWrong, general semantics) and some people seemingly understand it but think it's contradictory
@aphercotropist. -
Well fwiw the point of the essay is that the LW take is seriously misleading and close to the root of how they misunderstand everything.
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
FWIW, this is the same place
@nosilverv and I came around to re: Mark saying emptiness is realizing part of map=territory. I think the confusion is because map and territory retains a kind of noumenal/phenomenal distinction that the interaction view dispenses with.pic.twitter.com/LtL3RoGyrH
-
“retains a kind of noumenal/phenomenal distinction that the interaction view dispenses with”: yes, that!
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.