I don't see a disagreement here! My explicit knowledge of both philosophies is a bit past "I've read Beginning of Infinity and Meaningness". Possible I'm misunderstanding either here.
Also possible I'm using them both fluidly in such a way that they don't FEEL they disagree 

-
-
I want to gently push back on the emptiness thing. I'll be just another voice in the cacophony, but it seems like you take a very scholarly approach to emptiness (which is excellent and critically valuable) but what about the direct experience part?
-
Agreed that there are exoteric and esoteric usages of the term, and dharma battles, and scholarly debates. But, I'll personally bite "emptiness is a phenomenological referential quality that confers immediate knowledge of something like 'that seeming territory is actually map'"
- 19 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I've been running into this problem...it seems as if "emptiness" is an illustration of what it is talking about, and a precise definition of it would be missing the point somehow.
-
That has not stopped 2000 years of logic-chopping academic arguments :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.