I like that play is toward the pattern side of the spectrum. Without a set of rules, you don’t have a game. (Also no game if there is too much pattern and few choices about how to act within the game.)
-
-
-
Yes, that is the main point I’ll make there :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wonderful! Wonder-ful! I definitely felt the Dzogchen connection, which is what I'm most at home with traditionally speaking. Radical curiosity has emerged as central when I teach. Feels like it ties together my Dzogchen roots in a new, fresh way. Definitely will be referencing!
-
Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This captures the feeling I got when I first read Chogyam Trungpa as a teenager, but it actually explains things as well. Took many years for me to figure out how his work connected with the dry stuff I consensus buddhism stuff I read...
-
Wow! Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
All of them are surely an antidote to all of them, whether nihilistic or not?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting stuff. Thank you! I’m going to keep reading other parts of your book.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Six ways of dancing with nebulosity and pattern.
