-
-
-
Replying to @context_ing
Stuart Brown’s book on play. It’s quite good: https://amzn.to/3aTg1RC
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Nice! Reminds me of the 'Play' tTenant from the John Dewey Kitchen Institute. "Far from being trivial, play is “interested absorption in activity for the sake of activity itself” (“Growth in Activity”). Defined thus, it is the heart of education." https://learn.uvm.edu/program/john-dewey-kitchen-institute/tenets/ …pic.twitter.com/CWi71lRRlU
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @context_ing
I noticed that when you posted it a couple days ago!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @context_ing @Meaningness
Ties to your work. "Rather than define play, look at its properties & appreciate play because of its purposelessness, its involuntariness, its attractiveness, the freedom it unlocks, the temporarily diminished self-consciousness, its associative potential & the desire embedded"
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
Yes I’m reading the book as prep for writing about play as a feature of the complete stance. (There was also supposed to be a page on that in _Reinventing Buddhist Tantra_. It would have said roughly the same things.)
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @context_ing
fyi
@ianbogost has a nice book Play Everything1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
