Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Meaningness's profile
David Chapman
David Chapman
David Chapman
@Meaningness

Tweets

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

meaningness.com/about-my-sites
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 12
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      🎙 Inspiring invitation to philosophy in the mode of Nietzsche and Heidegger: @JohannesAchill with @dgozil. Dry and technical at the beginning, but then wide-ranging and largely accessible. I resonate strongly with most of what he says (same influences!)https://anchor.fm/intellectualexplorersclub/episodes/Johannes-Niederhauser---In-Touch-With-What-Always-Has-Been-ebetkr …

      2 replies 1 retweet 24 likes
    2. Jake Orthwein‏ @JakeOrthwein Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @JohannesAchill @dgozil

      Is it fair to say that, when Johannes talks about philosophizing to come back around “to that which was: Being,” he’s referring to roughly what you call the complete stance? And in our continual renegotiation of what it is to Be, we get caught in various fixations along the way?

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @JakeOrthwein @JohannesAchill @dgozil

      Well, I can’t speak for Johannes, and it’s been ~30 years since I read the relevant works of Heidegger (which I may not have understood correctly) so anything I’d say is highly tentative. The “coming back” theme has to do with H’s reading of Ancient Greek philosophy, >

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    4. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @JakeOrthwein and

      > and I mostly haven’t read the Greeks (and mostly don’t like them based on the little I’ve read and secondary sources). H’s take on them was heavily influenced by the German Romantics, particularly Hölderlin, who I haven’t read at all (apparently he’s nearly untranslatable)

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    5. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @JakeOrthwein @JohannesAchill

      What does resonate for me here is the sense that modern philosophy has been mostly a losing-one’s-way, a counterproductive diversion into technical pseudoproblems and clever one-up word games that no one should care about.

      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
    6. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @JakeOrthwein @JohannesAchill

      So inasmuch as “the complete stance” addresses our actual way of being, maybe it does reflect a “return” to questions that matter, as Ancient Greek philosophy did. OTOH, afaik the understanding of the question which H developed in B&T is quite alien to Greek thinking.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    7. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @JakeOrthwein @JohannesAchill

      Re “in our continual renegotiation of what it is to Be, we get caught in various fixations along the way?”: B&T is also a nosology of ways of being, but the specifics are pretty different from what I’ve explored.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Jake Orthwein‏ @JakeOrthwein Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @JohannesAchill

      Thanks for this! Perhaps I should use quarantine as an opportunity to actually dive into Heidegger! I’d roughly been mapping ontotheology onto eternalism (grounding Being in fixed, supreme being), leading to a forgetfulness of Being as a necessarily ongoing process.

      3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 13
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @JakeOrthwein @JohannesAchill

      Yes, that seems right to me (but I haven’t read Heidegger’s key works on this issue, nor subsequent discourse).

      9:45 AM - 13 Mar 2020
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Mar 13
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @Meaningness @JakeOrthwein @JohannesAchill

          Usually I recommend reading Dreyfus before Heidegger, but he does introduce some distortions and has a different agenda. For you it might be better to go straight to the original, or to other secondary sources.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info