When I began, I was focussed on the first part, which explains why rationalism doesn’t work. But most of the book is about the positive alternative: a better (meta-rational) understanding of how rationality *does* work, and how to do it better.https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1231662426627592192 …
-
-
I've found another criticism: Kegan got stages 3&4 wrong. The model conflates some genuine advancements, like professionalism (https://srconstantin.wordpress.com/2015/07/31/forbearance/ …) and the managerial self (https://srconstantin.wordpress.com/2018/10/02/reflections-on-being-30/ …) with the wamb-vs-nerd personality type distinction (https://everythingstudies.com/2019/03/01/the-tilted-political-compass-part-1-left-and-right/ …).
-
*More STEM people "make it to 4". *Premodern religions were dualist, not monist. *From 4, 5 seems as if it lay toward 3. *Models of "ownership": - 3: everyone has usufruct, "owner" is steward paid in status. - 4: "owner" is a Platonic attribute of the object.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.