Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Meaningness's profile
David Chapman
David Chapman
David Chapman
@Meaningness

Tweets

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

meaningness.com/about-my-sites
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Malcolm  ☣️cean - check sense of smell  👃 —  🌎 🇨🇦‏ @Malcolm_Ocean Feb 18
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @Meaningness @11kilobytes

      relatedly, the traditional "laws of thought" are "laws of LHemisphere" law of identity law of non-contradiction law of excluded middle they only make sense in contextless spaces of zero nebulosity AI folks may not think literally these, but... similar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_thought#The_three_traditional_laws …

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 18
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @11kilobytes

      I’m interested in McGilcrist because so many people are fans. However, everything I’ve read about the book suggests it’s a pretty standard dual-process theory. That does give some insight but is limited and well-trod. Maybe I’m missing what’s distinctive? https://meaningness.com/eggplant/cognitive-science#dual-process …pic.twitter.com/yENH8BBxm6

      4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    3. wizard from earthsea‏ @tr4nsmute Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean @11kilobytes

      I am trying to check my understanding here--but would it be correct to say that the problem with dual process theories is that they: 1) assume reasonableness and rationality are "modules" in the mind 2) mix up reasonableness and relevance realization system. RR maps on to...

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. wizard from earthsea‏ @tr4nsmute Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @tr4nsmute @Meaningness and

      ...what Heidegger meant by "the world presented to us is already meaningful", and reasonableness and rationality are things we do--and do not necessarily correspond to specific cognitive modules.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    5. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @tr4nsmute @Malcolm_Ocean @11kilobytes

      Yes, all those! And additionally a dual process theory has to lump together a lot of disparate things to get down to just two categories. Important distinctions are deliberately obscured to make the classification seem to work.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @tr4nsmute and

      Example. When the LW rationalists first encountered my ranting against rationalism, they assumed I meant “emotions are important too” or “intuition is superior” or “sometimes it’s useful to believe false things” etc.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @tr4nsmute and

      Which was natural because those ARE standard critiques of rationalism; but they aren’t at all what I was saying. If the 10,000 things we do that aren’t rationality are lumped together, then you can gesture at the whole lot and say “important too” which is true but vague.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @tr4nsmute and

      Kahneman’s Thinking Fast And Slow, a particularly simplistic dual-process story, was perhaps the most important founding text for LW. (Along with Jaynes’ Logic Of Science, which is also terrible in a different way.)

      1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
    9. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @tr4nsmute and

      Or maybe the same way? They’re both really sloppy and full of outright obvious technical errors, but are carried along by the author’s enthusiastic confidence that he has The Answer for why irrational people are so wrong and how to fix everything.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    10. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @tr4nsmute and

      David Chapman Retweeted 乇乂ㄒ尺卂 ㄒ卄丨匚匚 (VIII)

      https://twitter.com/NinaStrohminger/status/1206678185573785603?s=20 …

      David Chapman added,

      乇乂ㄒ尺卂 ㄒ卄丨匚匚 (VIII) @NinaStrohminger
      Reading the part of Thinking Fast and Slow where he talks about how preposterous ego depletion, money priming, and the Lady Macbeth Effect seem to the naive observer. It has... not aged well pic.twitter.com/uWTMAliIr6
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      David Chapman‏ @Meaningness Feb 21
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @tr4nsmute and

      (the joke here, in case unclear, is that all these things turned out to be completely false, which should have been as obvious to Kahneman as it was to “naive observers”.)

      10:48 AM - 21 Feb 2020
      • 2 Likes
      • Kabelo Moiloa Malcolm ☣️cean - check sense of smell 👃 — 🌎🇨🇦
      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. wizard from earthsea‏ @tr4nsmute Feb 22
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @Meaningness @Malcolm_Ocean @11kilobytes

          Yes, I can certainly see how LWers could have interpreted it as a "rational thought" v/s "intuition" argument. The way you use these terms is not obvious at all--I think. First, you need to understand Heidegger's main point about intentionality or 'originary' transcendence...

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. wizard from earthsea‏ @tr4nsmute Feb 22
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @tr4nsmute @Meaningness and

          (which is confusing because I thought for a long time his main point was the ready at hand/present at hand distinction...); and then you have to grok the whole ethnomethodological flip and then relate these two. Maybe I'm slow but I encountered your text two years ago...

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. 2 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info