Article on the culture of OpenAI gave me weird flashbacks. The author couldn’t know this, but the personalities and ways of thinking are SO familiar from 1988. AI still attracts the same sort of person, subject to the same peculiar cognitive distortions.https://www.technologyreview.com/s/615181/ai-openai-moonshot-elon-musk-sam-altman-greg-brockman-messy-secretive-reality/ …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Any readings on the 1980's culture in AI research?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @11kilobytes
Hmm… nothing come immediately to mind, I’m afraid
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @11kilobytes
Curious what you think of Weizenbaum's famous book, which I've only read summaries of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Power_and_Human_Reason … Although it's not written about AI specifically, Neil Postman's "Technopoly" has some insightful critical things to say about technocracy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @11kilobytes
You know, I think I too have never actually read it! My vague recollection is that it seemed (from summaries I read in the 80s) too wooly and Romantic (in the philosophical sense) to be worth reading. Maybe I’d have a different opinion now.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
It occurs to me that one reason AI people didn’t take Dreyfus’ critique seriously may have been the assumption that he was just Weizenbaum 2.0, whereas (from my perhaps completely inaccurate impression of W) D’s arguments were much more incisive.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.