I had to read this twice to (mostly?) understand it. The logic of the argument is precise, but hidden in an exquisite bejeweled puzzle-box: playful misdirections, riddles, apparent non-sequiturs whose relevance the reader suddenly realizes much later... I love this stuff!
-
-
Show this thread
-
Because the content is important, I'm tempted to write a summary extracting the main points, for those who might not take the time to solve the puzzles. That would spoil the fun for other readers, though.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I haven't seen any riddle. What I caught, please tell me if you think I'm missing something big: - Exploration of: + Indexicality + Epistemology as a Game with rules + Myths as not even Indexical Knowledge, but mere Indexes/Pointers - Application of this to social science
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.