Philosophy is bunk. Pretty much. https://meaningness.com/eggplant/rationalism#philosophy …pic.twitter.com/KVv66XBtOb
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The analogy to Kegan I was driving at is that there are "problems" that seem to point more directly to the need for ontological restructuring. Unless an alternative is available, we tend to hold on to the prior paradigm -- and should, provided we don't deny there's a problem.
That makes sense… how does it relate to CR?
Right those “problems” are like the “problem” of how much steel such and such a bridge needs. It assumes we already have the relevant knowledge. You can just apply it mechanically.
OK, let’s say I am a biologist who is working on the tau protein in Alzheimer’s. Concretely, how does CR help me do my job? What do I do differently if I accept CR vs if I don’t?
May be helpful to disambiguate the Deutschian CR terms: Problem: Conflict between "theories" (including things like emotions, perceptions, and procedural knowledge). CR: Evolutionary process by which we solve problems. Variation (conjecture) and selection (criticism/refutation).
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.