And also *ought* to be done according to Important Theory right?
-
-
Well, according to ME, anyway!
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @vgr i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Oh i think I misunderstood you here—you meant “ought to be done according to official scientistic ideology.” Yes
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @vgr i sljedećem broju korisnika:
The problem is we don’t have accurate normative stories about how to do science well because we don’t have accurate descriptive stories about how it’s done at all
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @vgr i sljedećem broju korisnika:
I'm really curious about what's wrong about the Popperian Problems => Conjectures => Criticism by Experiment scheme? Noting that problems aren't only conflicts/paradoxes in an explanation, but basically anything that makes one dissatisfied about it.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @11kilobytes @vgr i sljedećem broju korisnika:
It’s not specific enough to be useful.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @vgr i sljedećem broju korisnika:
To be a bit more specific (:p), can one argue that there better and worse, though not systematic criteria for choosing between problems and interpretations of thoughts that inspire problems, and these cannot be accounted for in a crit-rat account of science?
@reasonisfun1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @11kilobytes @vgr i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Clearly it’s partly true that science proceeds by replacing old theories with better ones. But this is obvious and unhelpful.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @11kilobytes i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Unless there’s specific investigation of what “better” means in different cases, how to choose a criterion of betterness from among the many available, how to come up with better theories, how to design an experiment that will test a theory, >
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @11kilobytes i sljedećem broju korisnika:
and all the other practicalities of actually doing science, I don’t see that critical rationalism has anything to offer. There appears to be no there, there. I would love to be proven wrong!
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
Here’s a more detailed version of that critique of critical rationalism, suggesting we need a better theory :)pic.twitter.com/HCChsmUOqS
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @11kilobytes i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Mark ( 🧘 🧪 🧙♂️ 💩 ❤️) je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceDavid Chapman
"Better" is itself subject to critique. You get truth-seeking and goodness-seeking in the same system. It's very elegant.https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1222610007650230272 …
Mark ( 🧘 🧪 🧙♂️ 💩 ❤️) je dodan/na,
David Chapman @MeaningnessOdgovor korisnicima @Meaningness @11kilobytes i sljedećem broju korisnika: 4Unless there’s specific investigation of what “better” means in different cases, how to choose a criterion of betterness from among the many available, how to come up with better theories, how to design an experiment that will test a theory, >1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @meditationstuff @Meaningness i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Er, maybe a bit more clearly, criteria of betterness, their selection, experimental design, everything, is subject to critique, including the theories themselves. It is meta-rational no-view.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.